遮阳伞
发表于 2025-3-21 19:15:14
书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0588163<br><br> <br><br>
引起
发表于 2025-3-21 21:33:34
The Role of Logic in Legal Reasoning,easoning. I shall do so mainly by discussing some objections to logical methods which can be found in legal philosophy and AI-and-law. Some of them are an application to the legal domain of more general criticism of logic discussed in Chapter 1. Section 2.1 briefly discusses some basic misunderstand
狂乱
发表于 2025-3-22 02:03:42
The Need for New Logical Tools,ods, for which reason new logical tools are needed. In this chapter I shall in more detail go into the causes of the limitations and the nature of the needed tools. A first cause is the rule-guided rather than rule-governed nature of legal reasoning. Because of the open, unpredictable nature of the
adulterant
发表于 2025-3-22 06:28:50
Logics for Nonmonotonic Reasoning,ious chapter two basic motivations for using nonmonotonic forms of reasoning. The first is common to all domains of common-sense reasoning. In solving a problem people do not always have enough information to make a safe step towards the conclusion; instead, they often have to jump to conclusions by
Obsessed
发表于 2025-3-22 11:24:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5882/588163/588163_5.png
Neuralgia
发表于 2025-3-22 14:39:31
Preferring the Most Specific Argument,e solutions to a problem and . the exceptional one if it exists. In this method exceptions can be left implicit: no use has to be made of exception or applicability clauses, since exceptions are identified as a result of the choice. As already mentioned in Chapter 3, when applied to legislation this
conceal
发表于 2025-3-22 17:15:07
Reasoning with Inconsistent Information,nt since, as noted in Chapter 3, the information with which a lawyer is confronted is often contradictory. However, the relevance of this chapter is not restricted to the legal domain; in other domains of common-sense reasoning people are also often confronted with conflicting sources of information
勉强
发表于 2025-3-22 23:04:32
Reasoning about Priority Relations,e expressed as an ordering on rules. However, apart from specificity almost nothing has yet been said about the possible sources of the priorities. For some time in AI the (often implicit) hope has been that the sources of these priorities are of a general, domain independent nature. As a consequenc
星球的光亮度
发表于 2025-3-23 01:31:11
Systems for Defeasible Argumentation,t, Section 9.1 gives a conceptual description in general terms of the notion of an argumentation system, followed by a discussion in Section 9.2 of the main systems of this kind that have so far been developed. After that, Section 9.3, discusses some other recent developments, which are not argument
魅力
发表于 2025-3-23 06:19:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5882/588163/588163_10.png