MOAN 发表于 2025-3-23 11:50:33
A Standard System of Deontic Logic,have not stated that they cannot be accepted as a rational reconstruction of normative reasoning. There is, nevertheless, a formal system on which, although it has been disputed as a whole as well as with regard to its theorems, several other systems are founded, which other systems can be regardedMINT 发表于 2025-3-23 16:54:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588025/588025_12.pngAmbulatory 发表于 2025-3-23 20:07:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588025/588025_13.pnghyperuricemia 发表于 2025-3-24 01:04:28
Conditional Norms,). In section VI.8 we have seen that the internal deontic implication cannot provide an adequate formulation of ‘commitment’. Also with regard to the external deontic implication, discussed in section VI.9, there were difficulties.捐助 发表于 2025-3-24 04:51:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588025/588025_15.pngLucubrate 发表于 2025-3-24 09:29:50
Law and Philosophy Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/588025.jpg灾祸 发表于 2025-3-24 13:39:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588025/588025_17.png土产 发表于 2025-3-24 15:41:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588025/588025_18.png外露 发表于 2025-3-24 21:55:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5881/588025/588025_19.png包裹 发表于 2025-3-25 00:13:04
The Possibility of Deontic Logic,is ‘no longer self-evident that logic presents a possibility for normative reasoning’. This is connected with the fact that, if normative judgements cannot be derived from factual judgements, it is no longer self-evident that those normative judgements can be either true of false.