probiotic 发表于 2025-3-21 17:27:25
书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0587998<br><br> <br><br>不可思议 发表于 2025-3-22 00:07:26
Language and Metaphysics,itable return to metaphysical problems. In this chapter I propose to examine the relation between metaphysics and language. In a sense much of what I will say in this chapter has been implied in the preceding one. But I want to emphasize certain points and to clarify some others before I undertake t泥沼 发表于 2025-3-22 00:47:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587998/587998_3.png可用 发表于 2025-3-22 08:38:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587998/587998_4.pngNOCT 发表于 2025-3-22 11:51:35
On What There is,en the object-domain of metaphysics is not unique and it is better to turn the whole matter over to the empirical sciences. Were this so those who have urged that this be done because all metaphysicsl statements are either empirical and as a consequence belong to scientific languages or emotive andanalogous 发表于 2025-3-22 13:10:36
How We Know the Essence of What There is, consider some of the objections to such knowledge. These objections may be directed either at the necessity for such a knowledge or at the claim that there are propositions which are the result of such knowledge. If we use the somewhat ambiguous words ‘intuitive’ and ‘intuition’ the objections takehumectant 发表于 2025-3-22 20:55:32
The Verification of Metaphysical Statements,onditions can we say that S in M is verified? It is important to note that I am not asking under what conditions we can say that S is verified in M, but under what conditions S which occurs in M may be said to be verified. The difference between ‘S is verified in M’ and ‘S in M is verified’ should bCorroborate 发表于 2025-3-23 00:59:51
The Veridicality of Eidetic Intuition,as been intuited by eidetic intuition, what, if anything, can be done about it? Is it possible to bring about agreement or to clarify the source of disagreement ? This implies that the claim to eidetic intuition is not in itself a proof that eidetic intuition did as a matter of fact occur.Agnosia 发表于 2025-3-23 04:08:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587998/587998_9.png眨眼 发表于 2025-3-23 05:41:48
Negation, Conjunction, and Events, also be conceded that we never find unrelated events. So although the ultimate metaphysical unit is symbolized by the expression ‘fx’, we never do find ‘fx’ alone and we should be tempted to conclude that we never accost a simple event. From the point of view of experience of whatever kind, we must