Extricate
发表于 2025-3-23 10:04:37
On Fair Distribution of Indivisible Goods,Suppose that . indivisible objects are to be distributed among . persons, in the sense that each object will be ascribed to a single person. What are the requirements of justice for a procedure effecting the distribution, i.e. for a function from the set of objects to the set of persons?
繁忙
发表于 2025-3-23 14:17:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3352-4deontic logic; ethics; logic; morality
吃掉
发表于 2025-3-23 18:44:53
Nijhoff International Philosophy Serieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/587960.jpg
Nausea
发表于 2025-3-23 22:37:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587960/587960_14.png
Admonish
发表于 2025-3-24 02:27:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587960/587960_15.png
palliative-care
发表于 2025-3-24 07:08:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587960/587960_16.png
成绩上升
发表于 2025-3-24 14:38:21
Whatever happened to Deontic Logic?,where argued, with Aristotle’s logic: he began by distinguishing two sharply distinct categories, names . and predicables .but came to merge these categories in the category of terms . which could pass freely between subject—role and predicate—role. So it happened also, I shall now argue, with deont
其他
发表于 2025-3-24 18:28:45
The Ethical Root of Language, we may do harm, not for harm’s sake, but for some other reason: but then, if the harm has been culpable, we are likely to hate the one who has suffered the injury. Now, if I thus unjustly hate a man, I am likely to think ill of him, and am disposed to believe that he has done things which he has no
Chagrin
发表于 2025-3-24 22:02:04
Deontic Logic and Imperative Logic,rmed to the verification principle, but was not a form of naturalism. Naturalism was supposed to have been refuted by G.E. Moore; but then if one was not a naturalist, one must, it was supposed, be an intuitionist, and such a view was too facile a solution to one’s epistemological problems to be pla
盖他为秘密
发表于 2025-3-25 02:00:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5880/587960/587960_20.png