SEEK
发表于 2025-3-23 09:59:58
Ontologies and Ontologicscal analysis leads to rather troublesome questions: Are philosophical disciplines methodologically and/or essentially related and connected? Are particular philosophical disciplines scientific? And, if the answer is not definite, to what extent is this so? Do philosophical disciplines form a uniform
逢迎白雪
发表于 2025-3-23 16:19:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5879/587869/587869_12.png
RALES
发表于 2025-3-23 19:08:16
Two Levels of Modality: An Algebraic Approachlogics, namely those associated with algebraic models. It is an attempt to study modal logics within the framework of the theory of abstract logics. We begin by recalling some terms, constructions and notations, mainly taken from Brown & Suszko (1973).
脆弱吧
发表于 2025-3-23 22:40:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5879/587869/587869_14.png
轻推
发表于 2025-3-24 04:20:57
When May G. E. Moore’s Definition of Internal Relation be Used Rationally?n controversy over the nature of relations. The author of that definition was right in his claim that the sense he established was metaphysically neutral for its serviceability in expressing each of the three positions to be separated in the dispute. Neohegelians saying that every relation is intern
paragon
发表于 2025-3-24 08:07:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5879/587869/587869_16.png
奖牌
发表于 2025-3-24 12:07:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5879/587869/587869_17.png
STALE
发表于 2025-3-24 16:43:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5879/587869/587869_18.png
擦掉
发表于 2025-3-24 21:58:02
Basic Norm and Metalanguage. Historical Bckground of Kelsen’s Ideasrofessor of international law and legal philosophy Alfred VERDROSS (1890–1980) — the pure theory of law — is the “most refined and most successful” theory of law.. It should be mentioned that VERDROSS held a strong natural law position — quite contrary to KELSEN. According to another student of KELS
避开
发表于 2025-3-25 03:01:34
Early Systems of Formal Pragmaticsatics is, and still worse — I am afraid nobody does. In fact, the dispute on the aims, methods, scope and limits of pragmatics started as early as in the late thirties, and continues up to now. The discussion is far from being concluded, and that is just why you can still find there in the literatur