极深 发表于 2025-3-23 13:40:35
Evaluation of Metaphor in Literature,. In literary theory it has been argued that foregrounding plays a central role in evaluation, and empirical research in support of this relationship was reviewed in Chapter 2. Studies by both van Peer (1986) and by Miall and Kuiken (1994) provide good evidence that foregrounding affects the evaluat预定 发表于 2025-3-23 16:57:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5873/587280/587280_12.png法律的瑕疵 发表于 2025-3-23 20:08:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5873/587280/587280_13.pngDevastate 发表于 2025-3-23 22:16:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5873/587280/587280_14.png盖他为秘密 发表于 2025-3-24 04:54:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5873/587280/587280_15.pngHyperplasia 发表于 2025-3-24 10:25:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5873/587280/587280_16.pngamplitude 发表于 2025-3-24 11:58:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5873/587280/587280_17.png暂时别动 发表于 2025-3-24 15:28:23
Literature in L2 Teaching,s on literature proper—on ‘written texts which have a certain aesthetic value and some perceived status in the culture of which they are artefacts’ (p. 45). This is in line with the view of literature discussed in Chapter 1.Matrimony 发表于 2025-3-24 21:31:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5873/587280/587280_19.pngAqueous-Humor 发表于 2025-3-25 01:57:34
Evaluation of Metaphor in Literature,was reviewed in Chapter 2. Studies by both van Peer (1986) and by Miall and Kuiken (1994) provide good evidence that foregrounding affects the evaluations of L1 readers in the predicted manner, but there is virtually no research on how it affects L2 evaluations. The present chapter investigates L2 evaluation of literature against this background.