Proponent 发表于 2025-3-23 11:30:03
2946-479X childhoods are written and politicised, and how childhood intersects with perceptions of animals and the natural environment. The range of chapters in this collection and the texts they consider demonstrates th978-3-031-38353-3978-3-031-38351-9Series ISSN 2946-479X Series E-ISSN 2946-4803即席 发表于 2025-3-23 16:57:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587101/587101_12.pnganarchist 发表于 2025-3-23 21:18:04
The Victorian Baby of Popular Fiction babyhood. Their representations register a dynamic engagement with an undeniable sentimentalisation that formed a powerful force in driving interest in early childhood, child rights, and infant care, even as it boosted a commercialisation that became critiqued as exploitation. Thus, Charles DickensEndoscope 发表于 2025-3-24 00:50:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587101/587101_14.pngminimal 发表于 2025-3-24 02:46:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587101/587101_15.pnghomeostasis 发表于 2025-3-24 09:53:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587101/587101_16.png遗传学 发表于 2025-3-24 14:14:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587101/587101_17.pngineffectual 发表于 2025-3-24 17:51:27
“Bring back the fairy times”: Framing the Child in Frances Browne’s e tend to pass by . with benign nods, essays on it are not to be found. Yet it is arguably one of the great works of Victorian fantasy, which the magnificence of ., . and the . books has concealed” (19). This chapter seeks to redress this critical neglect by exploring more fully how Browne’s work enOffstage 发表于 2025-3-24 21:01:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5872/587101/587101_19.pngordain 发表于 2025-3-25 00:35:01
Feeding Dickens’s Dysfunctional Families: Advocating Social Surrogacy in , andhand” in a social, not bio-kinship context, and by doing so, they might help us to question the biological essentialism that dominates familialist thought, oppresses women who mother, and abandons children to the uncertain supports of the private, domestic, family.