迁移
发表于 2025-3-28 15:43:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5867/586660/586660_41.png
bleach
发表于 2025-3-28 20:20:56
Reply to Miss Berry’s Paper, her point is that Biran’s position somehow stands for a wider philosophical persuasion, viz., that of phenomenology. If this understanding is correct it may be advisable first to look briefly into her criticism of Biran and next into the relevance of this criticism to phenomenology. Finally, we sh
有杂色
发表于 2025-3-29 00:33:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5867/586660/586660_43.png
碎石头
发表于 2025-3-29 05:55:48
The Two Personsbeen attacked from various points of view. Many of these attacks, however, so far from rejecting what is usually known as Cartesian dualism, have merely launched the same doctrine under a new rig. They have distinguished between mental and physical objects, processes and cognitions (between ideas an
Facet-Joints
发表于 2025-3-29 08:47:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5867/586660/586660_45.png
显赫的人
发表于 2025-3-29 13:09:43
The Critic and the Lover of Artnorm actually exists. It seems that he recognised that if there is no common aesthetic sense a universal community of taste could not be achieved simply by everyone’s contemplating Nature and Art disinterestedly, for he suggests that if this common sense does not exist the demand of the judgement of
NOCT
发表于 2025-3-29 19:16:57
Commentary on Mr Elliott’s Paperin deep agreement with its author; and how could it be otherwise, when Mr Elliott is so kind as to invoke me, and when he has perfectly understood what I have tried to say elsewhere ? If I enter this discussion with him, it is in no sense to present a contrary thesis, but to take up and extend his r
摇曳
发表于 2025-3-29 22:55:35
Chairman’s Opening Remarksnts are in principle correct or incorrect. Whether they admit it or not, they are passing verdicts for which reasoned justification could be provided. This view, he maintains, is not merely unduly restrictive, it is essentially mistaken. It presupposes either some kind of natural norm (perhaps a com
知识分子
发表于 2025-3-30 02:15:36
A Reply to ‘A Person’s Future and the Mind—Body Problem’ritish philosophy (e.g. the analysis of the logical priority of the concept of ‘person’) with those of Continental philosophy (e.g. the more phenomenological analysis of the future-dimension of human existence).
allude
发表于 2025-3-30 07:05:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5867/586660/586660_50.png