engagement
发表于 2025-3-30 12:01:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_51.png
CLIFF
发表于 2025-3-30 14:09:10
F. Dretske’s Total Rejection of the Hempel-Modelemaining ones appear to be a wholesale repudiation of the received view about laws. They are not friendly amendments. If true, they cut deeply into the received view. We turn therefore to a detailed consideration of them.
仔细检查
发表于 2025-3-30 19:15:59
D. Armstrong’s Account of Laws: Identity Lost, Regained, and Lost Againressive power of physical theories, beyond those set by the use of ordinary mathematical analysis. We noted in Chap. ., there isn’t any problem with those universals used by Dretske, . they are physical magnitudes.
无所不知
发表于 2025-3-30 22:32:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_54.png
开头
发表于 2025-3-31 02:39:03
Book 2019nguishing between laws and accidental generalizations (LAG). Among the new consequences of this proposal it is proved that any explanation of a contingent generalization shows that the generalization is not accidental. The second part involves .physical. theories, their modality, and their explanato