环形 发表于 2025-3-23 11:22:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_11.png

大方不好 发表于 2025-3-23 16:39:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_12.png

Limousine 发表于 2025-3-23 21:27:02

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_13.png

BIDE 发表于 2025-3-24 00:03:00

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_14.png

Irremediable 发表于 2025-3-24 06:16:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_15.png

Anthem 发表于 2025-3-24 08:54:52

F. Dretske’s Total Rejection of the Hempel-Modellowing, refer to these somewhat different accounts as “the standard view”. Dretske’s view has been seen as marking a striking shift away from that view, and the beginning of a series of new non-Humean accounts. His account of laws forcefully declared that.With the exception of the first claim, the r

谄媚于人 发表于 2025-3-24 11:28:45

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_17.png

tenosynovitis 发表于 2025-3-24 16:57:15

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_18.png

fodlder 发表于 2025-3-24 21:21:49

Laws and Accidental Generalities evident in Aristotle (if one understands that his reference to four kinds of causes should be understood as his interest in four kinds of explanations.) In our time, the emphasis was very clear in C. Hempel and P. Oppenheim’s seminal essay (Cf. Chap. .).

马赛克 发表于 2025-3-25 03:07:17

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5822/582111/582111_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Laws and Explanations; Theories and Modal Possibilities; Arnold Koslow Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Relatvization of Laws