obdurate 发表于 2025-3-21 18:22:37

书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0582085<br><br>        <br><br>

FRAX-tool 发表于 2025-3-21 22:22:00

Lessons from Waluchow: Necessity, Desirability, and Intelligibility of (Weak) Judicial Discretionof their best judgments as to the democratic community’s best judgments concerning the demands of moral truth.” Moreover, I disagree with him that there is: “No way of telling, among the various reasonable answers offered, which is right, or whose answer is best—or even better.”

Misnomer 发表于 2025-3-22 03:22:28

Waluchow’s Theory of Constitutional Interpretation from a Rhetorical-Argumentative Point of Viewme process as the construction of idealized audiences which are utilized in rhetorical branches of argumentation theory to evaluate reasoning. I then go on to develop the rhetorical theory of judicial reasoning that, I believe, should stand behind Waluchow’s approach to judicial review.

使闭塞 发表于 2025-3-22 08:28:42

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_4.png

Constituent 发表于 2025-3-22 12:14:15

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_5.png

Measured 发表于 2025-3-22 15:41:43

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_6.png

费解 发表于 2025-3-22 17:53:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_7.png

浮夸 发表于 2025-3-22 23:20:55

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_8.png

ineffectual 发表于 2025-3-23 03:35:42

Thomas Bustamante,Saulo de Matos,André L. S. CoelhPresents a unique book dedicated to study in depth a widely appreciated and globally acknowledged legal philosophy.Includes comprehensive studies from experienced and senior scholars.Provides original

Jacket 发表于 2025-3-23 07:11:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_10.png
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning; Essays on W. J. Walu Thomas Bustamante,Saulo de Matos,André L. S. Coelh Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if a