G-spot
发表于 2025-3-23 10:37:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_11.png
十字架
发表于 2025-3-23 17:54:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_12.png
GILD
发表于 2025-3-23 18:26:24
Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning978-3-031-61879-6Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
PLIC
发表于 2025-3-24 01:01:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_14.png
Commodious
发表于 2025-3-24 03:15:44
Incorporationism, Inclusivism, and Indeterminacyitivists. In this essay, I explore the complexities of hard cases—cases in which there is substantial disagreement among judges or other legal experts over the correct answers to any questions at issue—in order to reflect upon the implications of those complexities for the legal-positivist theses wh
完全
发表于 2025-3-24 09:29:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_16.png
Cardiac
发表于 2025-3-24 11:24:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_17.png
弓箭
发表于 2025-3-24 15:24:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5821/582085/582085_18.png
Nibble
发表于 2025-3-24 20:31:58
Some Issues Concerning Waluchow’s Early Critique of Dworkin in k in all theoretical debates concerning the matter. The book’s central issues and arguments have stayed at the core of the dominant debate on legal theory over the last 20 years, at least in the Anglo-Saxon tradition. It represents one of the most thoughtful responses to Ronald Dworkin’s legal theor
GLUT
发表于 2025-3-24 23:47:36
Competing Legal Positivisms, Methodology and Distinctive Visions of Lawa prominent figure in many other areas of legal and moral theory. This chapter will consider his contributions to the inclusive-exclusive debate, focusing primarily on one aspect of the debate: whether inclusive legal positivism succeeds in offering a distinctive vision of the nature of law. In the