cathartic
发表于 2025-3-23 10:05:16
The Interactional Dynamic: Stories from the Back Region,eir engagement with the mysteries of their profession. In this chapter I hope to show, through an exploration of these teachers’ tales, how the mystery of . work sets them apart from other groups, and how their modes of sharing represent both a commitment to the seriousness of their profession and a
粗鄙的人
发表于 2025-3-23 14:51:15
Seeing Things Our Way: The Establishment of Common Perspectives,: the difference between dynamic collaboration and pallid conformity depends on it. So while argument in the Pen and IEC is similarly managed, the slightly ambiguous position of the head of DOTS generates perturbations in its negotiation there, and while the academics and research scientists are hap
我的巨大
发表于 2025-3-23 19:20:50
Us and Them: Constructing the Other,trary.’ This is an extreme reflection of the necessary truth that the existence of groups is dependent at least to some degree on the extent to which they can be distinguished from other groups and collections of individuals. So far I have concentrated on interactional features that characterise my
Provenance
发表于 2025-3-23 23:03:45
Conclusion,bstance to their achievements. Yet what is professionally achieved is also linguistically achieved and the identities that emerge from engagements with daily business are as much linguistic as professional. Although my exploration of this fundamental relationship has established no definitive charac
alabaster
发表于 2025-3-24 02:25:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581056/581056_15.png
情爱
发表于 2025-3-24 09:04:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581056/581056_16.png
BLAND
发表于 2025-3-24 14:33:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581056/581056_17.png
收集
发表于 2025-3-24 18:09:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581056/581056_18.png
fidelity
发表于 2025-3-24 21:14:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5811/581056/581056_19.png
Diskectomy
发表于 2025-3-25 02:15:38
Staying Onside: The Negotiation of Argument,ngineer collaborative positioning which reorients individual differences within a broader common purpose. I will suggest that this process depends on an orientation where notions of winning or losing an argument have no valency and that, instead, arguments are constructed for the purposes of . those involved.