Mri485
发表于 2025-3-30 09:06:46
Constitutionalism and Value-Free Method: Kelsen’s Legacy in Contemporary Challengesace of interpretative discretion. However, is constitutionalization the irreversible crisis of legal positivism and the abandonment of the methodological disenchantment of Kelsen legal science? In this chapter, the predominant conception of constitutionalization is placed into question by analyzing
accessory
发表于 2025-3-30 15:58:31
Hans Kelsen and Practical Reasonalong with the sociological or political or ideological aspects of law; and in this way the Pure Theory of law is forced to forgo some of its distinctive features, as is evident in Kelsen’s final works; and that the demise of practical reason strongly destabilizes the Pure Theory of law itself.
Rheumatologist
发表于 2025-3-30 17:38:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5424/542370/542370_53.png
正面
发表于 2025-3-30 23:09:02
Hans Kelsen’s Works and the Modern Theories of Human Rightspromising starting points, it would be improper to conclude that Kelsen ignores or slights human rights. It is not so difficult to restore links between the modern and contemporary theories of human rights and Kelsen’s work, through a consideration of his meta-ethical preferences and the global stru
武器
发表于 2025-3-31 04:56:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5424/542370/542370_55.png
设想
发表于 2025-3-31 05:06:33
Book 2017ical analysis of the relationship ofKelsenian legal science to constitutionalism, practical reason, and human rights..The last part involves an examination of the continued pertinence of Kelsenian legal science as a theory of the nature of law with a particular focus upon contemporary non-positivist