污秽
发表于 2025-3-25 05:52:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5424/542370/542370_21.png
独白
发表于 2025-3-25 10:25:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5424/542370/542370_22.png
CANE
发表于 2025-3-25 15:00:34
Natural Law and the Nature of Law: Kelsen’s Paradox be held to presuppose a “nature of law” whose criteria lead to transcendence with respect to positive law, even though it is not its purpose. The difficulty facing the pure theory of law is: to be absolutely dependent on its object, in a manner analogous to the physico-chemical sciences, and, as a
相互影响
发表于 2025-3-25 18:15:13
Natural Law Systematics: Is There a ‘Grundnorm’ in Natural Law? a “basic norm” (.) formed the basis for a purely scientific systematization of legal norms. Kelsen constructed the outlines for his legal doctrine in clear opposition to natural law theory. The latter was, in Kelsen’s view, a metaphysical legal order, that continued to influence legal science, desp
突变
发表于 2025-3-25 22:23:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5424/542370/542370_25.png
ILEUM
发表于 2025-3-26 02:36:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5424/542370/542370_26.png
黄瓜
发表于 2025-3-26 06:31:44
Hans Kelsen and Practical Reasonral law doctrine. Admitting that a practical use of reason is legitimate, namely, that there is a possible connection between intellect and will, would mean destroying the whole foundation of the scientific undertaking of the Pure Theory of law and its conception of the legal norm, which is its cent
generic
发表于 2025-3-26 11:24:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5424/542370/542370_28.png
懒惰民族
发表于 2025-3-26 16:29:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5424/542370/542370_29.png
Folklore
发表于 2025-3-26 19:13:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5424/542370/542370_30.png