拼图游戏 发表于 2025-3-21 19:06:49
书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0541807<br><br> <br><br>掺和 发表于 2025-3-21 22:09:09
The Late Kant and the Twentieth Century Physics,ted.experience, according to Hume’s principle, which also for Kant is beyond question, doesn’t possess any sort of intrinsic necessity. That is the reason why in the first Critique, and even more in the.occur locutions such as “empirical laws” or “empirical concepts”, which according to Criticism should be considered a mere.领带 发表于 2025-3-22 01:34:47
Logic and its Place in Nature,w to re-apply the distinctions between analytic and synthetic and between.and a.Quine) to answer these questions in what I hope is a novel and interesting way. My answers will put me at odds with both Kantians and Quineans; for I do not think that avoiding disagreements with either camp puts one wholly in the other.Antigen 发表于 2025-3-22 07:03:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541807/541807_4.png无政府主义者 发表于 2025-3-22 12:00:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541807/541807_5.pnggratify 发表于 2025-3-22 13:42:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541807/541807_6.pngGleason-score 发表于 2025-3-22 19:38:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541807/541807_7.pngVenules 发表于 2025-3-22 22:35:59
The Holistic Character of Kantian Intuition, quality, nor a supposed autonomous power of apprehension. What I have in mind is rather the capacity for a certain kind of . of apprehension: a kind of wholeness that is more basic than, and presupposed by, whatever kind of wholeness might be due to concepts, insofar as the latter are predicable of objects in intuition.对手 发表于 2025-3-23 04:52:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5419/541807/541807_9.pngSHOCK 发表于 2025-3-23 07:52:45
The Unity of Science and the Unity of Nature, some such theological foundation, it appears that we have no right to presuppose the unity of nature. The demand for unified science must thus be grounded differently, in the ease that unity would bring to our thought or, perhaps, in the efficiency that it would lend to our research.’