HAIL
发表于 2025-3-23 13:12:45
The analytic-synthetic distinctionecalled that the Gödel manuscripts appearing here were a direct philosophical reaction to Carnap’s viewpoint, and there is no other sufficiently detailed presentation of this viewpoint in the literature. I am convinced that Gödel’s manuscripts cannot be properly understood without having at least a summary of Carnap’s construction available.
来自于
发表于 2025-3-23 15:57:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5413/541300/541300_12.png
Incompetent
发表于 2025-3-23 21:57:58
Is mathematics syntax of language?, IIyntax of language.. I.e. the validity of mathematical propositions consists solely in their being consequences. of certain syntactical conventions about the use of symbols,. not in their describing states of affairs in some realm of things. Or, as Carnap puts it: ...
Indurate
发表于 2025-3-24 00:40:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5413/541300/541300_14.png
Myocarditis
发表于 2025-3-24 02:58:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5413/541300/541300_15.png
Esalate
发表于 2025-3-24 08:59:12
http://image.papertrans.cn/k/image/541300.jpg
轻快来事
发表于 2025-3-24 10:43:31
Is mathematics syntax of language?, VIIt is well known that Carnap has carried through, in great detail the conception that mathematics is syntax of language. However, not enough attention has been paid to the fact that the philosophical assertions which form the original content and the chief interest of this conception have by no means been proved thereby.
parasite
发表于 2025-3-24 15:57:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9248-3Volume; boundary element method; construction; language; logic; mathematics; philosophical works; philosoph
Amnesty
发表于 2025-3-24 21:49:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/55/5413/541300/541300_19.png
Alopecia-Areata
发表于 2025-3-24 23:48:05
Some basic theorems on the foundations of mathematics and their philosophical implicationsof reducing the concept of finite procedure to that of a machine with a finite number of parts, as has been done by the British mathematician Turing. As for the philosophical consequences of the results under consideration, I don’t think they have ever been adequately discussed or only taken notice