FAD 发表于 2025-3-21 16:17:54

书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0474544<br><br>        <br><br>

袖章 发表于 2025-3-21 23:04:19

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4746/474544/474544_2.png

原谅 发表于 2025-3-22 02:59:52

Connection Between the Principle of Inductive Evidence and the Bar Theorem,xplaining it properly. Therefore, I shall present here a more adequate treatment of the connection between . and .. In fact, I shall assume acquaintance with Sects. . and Theorem . of CS and provide a revised version of Theorem ..

大洪水 发表于 2025-3-22 08:25:23

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4746/474544/474544_4.png

行为 发表于 2025-3-22 12:20:49

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4746/474544/474544_5.png

MUMP 发表于 2025-3-22 16:19:47

Negationless Intuitionism,or such semantics, strong completeness is restorable. We argue that lawless negationless semantics is a suitable framework for a constructive . interpretation of any second-order formalisable theory (classical or intuitionistic, contradictory or not).

切割 发表于 2025-3-22 18:18:24

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4746/474544/474544_7.png

微尘 发表于 2025-3-22 23:06:29

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4746/474544/474544_8.png

卷发 发表于 2025-3-23 05:14:32

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4746/474544/474544_9.png

set598 发表于 2025-3-23 07:53:40

Negationless Intuitionism,mpleteness of full first-order logic fails. We then consider a .à la. for second-order intuitionistic logic. By using the theory of . we prove that, for such semantics, strong completeness is restorable. We argue that lawless negationless semantics is a suitable framework for a constructive . interp
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth; The Role of Brouwer’ Enrico Martino Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 Inform