四目在模仿 发表于 2025-3-23 13:27:31
The Nature of Modern Intimacy,of the ‘pure relationship’ (Giddens 1992, Beck and Beck-Gernsheim 1995). On the basis of evidence presented in Chapter 2 modern couple intimacy is not uniform and unitary and thus the pure relationship overlooks its finer gradations and complexities. The typology of couple intimacy in Chapter 2 depisacrum 发表于 2025-3-23 15:23:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4731/473080/473080_12.pngHemoptysis 发表于 2025-3-23 20:15:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4731/473080/473080_13.png群居动物 发表于 2025-3-24 01:56:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4731/473080/473080_14.png责任 发表于 2025-3-24 02:57:04
ions in self-disclosure, intimacy games and relationship habits. It describes how the dynamics of power and control in relationships give rise either to mutual satisfaction or to the unraveling of intimacy.978-0-230-24514-3难解 发表于 2025-3-24 08:02:34
The Varieties of Couple Intimacy,irically based studies (see Jamieson 1998 for an overview of such studies). A critical evaluation of these alternative accounts, and the evidence on which they are based, suggests that contemporary intimacy can be best understood in relation to a varied spectrum of types of personal relationship routinely found in couples and friends.补助 发表于 2025-3-24 11:39:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4731/473080/473080_17.png巡回 发表于 2025-3-24 16:08:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4731/473080/473080_18.pngnoxious 发表于 2025-3-24 22:54:19
Gender, Intimacy Styles and Skills,dity of claims that men and women differ in their capacities for intimacy. The view adopted here is that such claims are questionable on various grounds and I outline two strands of argument in support of this position.作茧自缚 发表于 2025-3-24 23:38:35
Intimacy, Power and Social Domains,y. In fact, structural, systemic or collective dimensions of power play a crucial role in so far as intimate (interpersonal) relationships are formed at the centre of a maelstrom of social domain and power influences.