Chameleon
发表于 2025-3-25 05:27:19
onal groups. Doctors, nurses and social workers are increasingly taking roles as managers with financial responsibility for services. The varying backgrounds of education and socialisation of managers and different professional groups creates barriers to mutual understanding and to effective and eff
缺乏
发表于 2025-3-25 09:52:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4728/472793/472793_22.png
BOOM
发表于 2025-3-25 15:27:06
Child protectionand the establishment of measures to promote such co-operation are outlined in detail. The roles, attitudes and constraints experienced by the different professionals involved are analysed and illustrated by the use of case studies.
endure
发表于 2025-3-25 18:27:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4728/472793/472793_24.png
Scintigraphy
发表于 2025-3-25 22:25:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4728/472793/472793_25.png
neolith
发表于 2025-3-26 01:34:01
Textbook 1995Latest editionuse of lack of collaboration. This text will contribute to the knowledge of inter-professional relationships and can be used as a basic guide to the issues involved, the services that require a multidisciplinary approach, and the strategies for working together.
栏杆
发表于 2025-3-26 04:59:13
fail because of lack of collaboration. This text will contribute to the knowledge of inter-professional relationships and can be used as a basic guide to the issues involved, the services that require a multidisciplinary approach, and the strategies for working together.978-0-333-59565-7
Spina-Bifida
发表于 2025-3-26 10:00:19
Professionalism and interprofessionalism in health and community care: some theoretical issueson to public policy which advocates a market in health and social care and a greater emphasis on voluntarism and consumerism. The authors suggest that these changes may lead inevitably to a process of deprofessionalisation.
HUMP
发表于 2025-3-26 15:08:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4728/472793/472793_29.png
circuit
发表于 2025-3-26 18:52:39
Ethical and resource issues in health and social care utilitarian and individual philosophical approaches to resource allocation are at the heart of ethical debates. The author examines the complexities of meaning and perception that underlie these issues.