Prehypertension
发表于 2025-3-21 19:31:07
书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0472652<br><br> <br><br>
micturition
发表于 2025-3-21 22:30:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4727/472652/472652_2.png
indoctrinate
发表于 2025-3-22 02:42:04
Reading Together: The Interplay Between Social and Cognitive Aspects in Argumentative and Non-argume how the two aspects are interrelated in children’s joint work. Focusing on participants’ talk while they are asked to solve together a reading comprehension task and to agree on a joint answer, we highlight the ways in which the process of dialogical construction of a common answer is influenced b
男学院
发表于 2025-3-22 07:25:51
The Role of the Teacher in Promoting Argumentative Interactions in the Learning Contexts of Higher during regular lessons. The aim is to bring to light the strict relationship between the types of questions asked by the teacher and the beginning and development of argumentative disciplinary discussions in the classroom, i.e., task-related discussions concerning the discipline taught in the course
新星
发表于 2025-3-22 08:49:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4727/472652/472652_5.png
Ige326
发表于 2025-3-22 13:46:30
Processes of Negotiation in Socio-scientific Argumentation About Vegetarianism in Teacher Educationhared argument in a decision-making context. Argumentative interactions can be seen as processes involving negotiations (Baker in The role of communication in learning to model. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 303–324, ., Argumentation and education: theoretical foundations and practices. Springer
Presbycusis
发表于 2025-3-22 19:41:37
Argumentation and Conflict Management in Online Epistemic Communities: A Narrative Approach to Wiki of . such as open-source programming languages or encyclopædias (for example, Wikipedia). In this chapter we focus on the case of Wikipedia, where general public participation has recently grown very quickly, in part due to egalitarian principles that encourage free participation by everyone. Howev
揉杂
发表于 2025-3-22 21:55:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4727/472652/472652_8.png
刻苦读书
发表于 2025-3-23 05:11:55
Imaginary Scenarios as Resources to Argue for Treatment Advice in Cancer Consultations,ents with all relevant information prior to treatment. Within a discursive and conversational approach, this chapter explores how an oncologist argues for treatment advice within cancer consultations. Drawing on a data set of video-recorded post-surgical cancer consultations collected in Italy, the
Ligneous
发表于 2025-3-23 08:43:37
Notes on Similarities and Differences in Studying Argumentation: A Synthetic View,eoretical and empirical issues at the forefront of research, by ensuring a view of how interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts is presently questioned and investigated. The chapter highlights the common issues of the volume concerning the analysis of how people argue in