声明
发表于 2025-3-27 00:47:22
Cognitive Interference personal preoccupations that interfere with attention to the task at hand. Personality can facilitate performance (e.g., through high motivation and the ability to become absorbed in tasks), but it can also debilitate it (e.g., through worrying about the consequences of failure and being uncooperative with the tester).
拖网
发表于 2025-3-27 03:06:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4717/471628/471628_32.png
fringe
发表于 2025-3-27 09:00:06
Theoretical and Empirical Relationships between Personality and Intelligencelity of interests for the different approaches to overlap. This is evident for areas of intellectual functioning like creativity or cognitive style (see Brody, 1972), but the prevailing tendency is to treat intelligence and personality as independent.
NICE
发表于 2025-3-27 13:13:51
Personality Trait Correlates of Intelligencek, 1985). Although some of the most influential figures in the field of intelligence and personality allude repeatedly to the inextricable web or nexus of interrelations among these two constructs (see Chapter 13), researchers have traditionally treated them as relatively independent factors in their analyses.
GULLY
发表于 2025-3-27 13:53:45
978-1-4419-3239-6Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995
记成蚂蚁
发表于 2025-3-27 18:07:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4717/471628/471628_36.png
exigent
发表于 2025-3-27 21:55:43
Perspectives on Individual Differenceshttp://image.papertrans.cn/i/image/471628.jpg
Pander
发表于 2025-3-28 05:19:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4717/471628/471628_38.png
laparoscopy
发表于 2025-3-28 08:05:00
The Interface between Intelligence and Personality as Determinants of Classroom LearningI find it helpful to consider the relationship between intelligence and personality as determinants of classroom learning in terms of three broad questions:
instructive
发表于 2025-3-28 10:26:30
Ideological Aspects of Research on Personality and Intelligence, the presence of a chapter on ideology has to be justified, or at least explained. Would the presentation of the field not have been complete without it? Do we really need this kind of reflection from the sidelines of actual research? At the outset, I also need to define (and possibly justify) my terms of reference.