Agronomy
发表于 2025-3-23 09:41:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4634/463312/463312_11.png
领先
发表于 2025-3-23 14:23:08
Incommensurability and the Normative Foundations of Scientific Knowledge of rational debate in science; (3) It is refuted by the existence of neutral, external, universal standards of theory-assessment in science; (4) It is refuted by the fact that there are typically good scientific reasons for preferring some standards to others, which relativists cannot see because t
ectropion
发表于 2025-3-23 18:22:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4634/463312/463312_13.png
幸福愉悦感
发表于 2025-3-23 22:35:22
Reasons, Radical Change and Incommensurability in Sciencece. Some of the strengths of this view, as contrasted with some major alternative interpretations of science, are sketched. In particular, the view that some ideas, in some theories or traditions, are “incommensurable” with ideas in at least some other scientific theories or traditions is analyzed critically and reinterpreted.
思考才皱眉
发表于 2025-3-24 04:35:06
Concept Formation and Commensurabilitysfers what is thought to be known about languages to science. Employing a cognitive-historical method that shifts the focus to the representational and reasoning practices of scientists in constructing new concepts provides a way of uncovering the nature of the . relations between successive representations of a domain.
Predigest
发表于 2025-3-24 06:49:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4634/463312/463312_16.png
空洞
发表于 2025-3-24 11:34:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4634/463312/463312_17.png
sulcus
发表于 2025-3-24 16:50:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4634/463312/463312_18.png
set598
发表于 2025-3-24 21:06:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4634/463312/463312_19.png
编辑才信任
发表于 2025-3-24 23:36:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4634/463312/463312_20.png