AER 发表于 2025-3-26 21:35:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460722/460722_31.png吞下 发表于 2025-3-27 01:09:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460722/460722_32.png星球的光亮度 发表于 2025-3-27 06:28:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460722/460722_33.png虚弱 发表于 2025-3-27 11:19:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460722/460722_34.png退潮 发表于 2025-3-27 16:21:38
Introduction, division of labor between syntax and semantics, with a focus on recent neo-constructionist theories, the discussion turns first to a presentation of the theory to be developed and the notation to be adopted. This presentation includes the basics of phrase structure and syntactic primitives, as wellCabg318 发表于 2025-3-27 18:46:33
,The Morphosyntax of , , much of the rest of the book. The primary goal here is to defend the view that . has the morphosyntax of a clitic, rather than a suffix. While the clitic analysis has been around for some time, there is also a long tradition arguing that it is a suffix with no systematic syntactic function. The poimusicologist 发表于 2025-3-28 01:58:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460722/460722_37.pngZEST 发表于 2025-3-28 02:26:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460722/460722_38.pngHerbivorous 发表于 2025-3-28 09:33:48
Applicatives and Applied Datives,ructure in recent years, and they are a robust aspect of Icelandic syntax. Sect. 5.1 provides an overview of different kinds of applicative structures, and argues that Icelandic does not have so-called “high applicatives,” but does have “low” and “high-low” applicatives. Sect. 5.2 turns to the analyBIPED 发表于 2025-3-28 11:49:31
More on the Syntax of -, Verbs,he analysis and argumentation there. Its purpose is both to support the general view of -. presented in previous chapters, as well as to provide a broader picture of Icelandic morphosyntax, which should allow for more thorough comparisons with other languages. Section . focuses on verbs which seem t