浅滩
发表于 2025-3-28 14:50:53
The Visualised Chronotope, the Greeks absorb the unlimited nature of the new visual media of money into the unlimited chronotope of mystery-cult that is, for this purpose, opened out on the public stage. One thinks of the blindness to which the money-tyrants such as Pentheus, Kreon and Oedipus succumb.
Enliven
发表于 2025-3-28 20:06:57
Visual and Linguistic Nihilism and humanism reinforce a still more abstract, alienated concept of humankind. Coupled with the . and (literally) demonisation of Dionysus is the erasure of any trace of the god’s socio-political potential to confront money as a lethal visual media.
anesthesia
发表于 2025-3-29 00:44:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4310/430984/430984_43.png
overweight
发表于 2025-3-29 05:14:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4310/430984/430984_44.png
多产子
发表于 2025-3-29 08:36:25
Dionysiac Language (Pre-1799–1802)that is, language that speaks only of abstract, superficial images that promote individual profit—is made clear by Hölderlin’s Dionysian description of modern money-tyrants who peer through “he telescope […] and coun ./.[.] ..”
非实体
发表于 2025-3-29 13:28:01
Dionysiac Language (1802–1804 and After)rit of their intentions to “scan every word”. On the other hand, Hölderlin’s elaborates this linguistic technique to resist monetised and visualised languages in the poet’s imagination of a future voyage to “the pure word”, ., of Dionysian Greece.
强化
发表于 2025-3-29 18:12:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4310/430984/430984_47.png
electrolyte
发表于 2025-3-29 20:47:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4310/430984/430984_48.png
expound
发表于 2025-3-30 01:45:16
Wakers-of-the-deadral past to battle the estrangement of modern time. Although, like all romantics, Hölderlin’s experimental voyage to capsizes, the chapter concludes by drawing attention to his forthcoming socio-political significance for us today.
你正派
发表于 2025-3-30 06:31:26
Hölderlinian Hyper-Abstractionste his uncanny capacity to illuminate the theatrical tension that this cataclysmic event calls forth), Hölderlin follows the hyper-abstract—and significantly monetised (and visualised)—unconscious of the presocratic Herakleitos in his references to “the One differentiated in itself”.