TOUT
发表于 2025-3-21 19:37:56
书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0429463<br><br> <br><br>
极深
发表于 2025-3-21 20:16:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4295/429463/429463_2.png
GNAT
发表于 2025-3-22 04:01:16
978-94-017-7987-6Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
depreciate
发表于 2025-3-22 07:50:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4295/429463/429463_4.png
Licentious
发表于 2025-3-22 12:32:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8672-0Alterations of Corporality And Body Images; Anthropological Arguments in Human Rights; Basis for Human
condescend
发表于 2025-3-22 13:24:47
Human Rights and Human Animalse necessary to justify some of the specific contents of human rights. To that end, he portrays humans as a special sort of animal endowed with two natures. This anthropological approach provides the argumentative framework within which we can derive some, but not all, of the specific contents of human rights, as Ladwig claims.
单调女
发表于 2025-3-22 18:13:29
Human Rights and Basic Needsl or even most human rights, but in his view it is clear that it grounds more human rights than the idea of basic needs. He concludes that the notion of a basic need lacks the requisite underlying normative character and that is why it is not the sort of thing that can ground any rights at all.
确定无疑
发表于 2025-3-22 23:11:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4295/429463/429463_8.png
JOG
发表于 2025-3-23 04:09:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4295/429463/429463_9.png
Derogate
发表于 2025-3-23 07:21:25
Species, Potentiality and Their Manipulation. In light of this, the article examines proposals made by Kant, Fichte, and Spaemann for how to understand the relationship between the reason and the criteria of moral status and contrasts them with recent developments in genetics that have made species membership and embryo potential, to some extent, manipulable.