BRIEF
发表于 2025-3-23 10:01:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4294/429331/429331_11.png
几何学家
发表于 2025-3-23 15:18:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4294/429331/429331_12.png
ascend
发表于 2025-3-23 19:28:43
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59288-0Human nature; Charles Darwin; Evolution; Sociobiology; Evolutionary ethics; Literature; Ethics
Biguanides
发表于 2025-3-24 00:20:01
http://image.papertrans.cn/h/image/429331.jpg
疼死我了
发表于 2025-3-24 05:11:49
978-1-349-95514-5The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
endure
发表于 2025-3-24 08:41:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4294/429331/429331_16.png
MURAL
发表于 2025-3-24 10:40:47
Book 2016and the newer, Darwinian model. In the traditional view, the human being is a hybrid being, with alower, animal nature and a higher, rational or “spiritual” component. Thecompeting Darwinian account does away with the idea of a higher nature andattempts to provide a complete reduction of human natur
干涉
发表于 2025-3-24 16:51:58
Introduction: Bridging the Two Cultures,f biology or at least be Darwinized, that is, interpreted in terms of evolutionary principles. At the heart of both issues is the question of whether the mechanistic, materialistic model adopted by science is appropriate to understanding human behavior, which unlike particles appears to be rational and goal-directed.
expound
发表于 2025-3-24 21:11:37
Does Science Refute Free Will?,usion. In this chapter, we show why the arguments made against free will are misguided. There is no reason to believe that science has raised any serious doubt about our capacity to deliberate and choose based on reason. Indeed, science itself presupposes just such a rational capacity.
爱社交
发表于 2025-3-25 02:38:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4294/429331/429331_20.png