reperfusion
发表于 2025-3-26 21:46:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428228/428228_31.png
cardiopulmonary
发表于 2025-3-27 01:44:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428228/428228_32.png
Heterodoxy
发表于 2025-3-27 08:43:23
The Assimilation of Galileo’s Theoryrule – which claims that the consecutive distances acquired in equal times grow according to the series 1, 3, 5, 7, 9. First, this chapter discusses Fabri’s acceptance of the Galilean key principle – simple proportionality between velocity and time – while nevertheless rejecting (like most contempor
晚来的提名
发表于 2025-3-27 09:27:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428228/428228_34.png
ZEST
发表于 2025-3-27 15:32:10
Fabri and Conservation of Rectilinear Motionnt among historians (especially since Annelise Maier and Alexandre Koyré), that Jesuits in general – and Fabri in particular – adamantly rejected inertia, or more exactly, Conservation of Rectilinear Motion, i.e. the assertion that an object once moved in a certain direction, and henceforth affected
软弱
发表于 2025-3-27 20:03:57
The Conservation and Inexhaustibility of Impetusntified as God. Thus Fabri formulates an opinion similar to that of Descartes, who held God’s immutability responsible for the conservation of the quantity of motion. Accordingly, Fabri adopts Descartes’ insight that the question which should be raised in the context of projectiles is not their pers
Radiculopathy
发表于 2025-3-27 23:20:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428228/428228_37.png
resilience
发表于 2025-3-28 02:28:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428228/428228_38.png
STEER
发表于 2025-3-28 09:56:58
Projectile Motion and the Rejection of Superposition, in which Fabri adheres to basic conservation of rectilinear motion but rejects Galileo’s principle of superposition, in favor of an Aristotelian-style “.” mechanism which is responsible for the destruction of violent impetus. This chapter shows that while adhering to his basic “inertial framework”
Spinal-Fusion
发表于 2025-3-28 14:11:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428228/428228_40.png