上腭
发表于 2025-3-23 10:13:34
James FillerD protein structure using distance information obtained from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) experiments [., .]. It is worth mentioning that the 2002 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to the chemist Kurt Wüthrich for the development of the application of NMR to determine protein structures using
泥沼
发表于 2025-3-23 17:55:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425264/425264_12.png
神经
发表于 2025-3-23 19:07:43
Beginningsblem, and how it is manifested historically. A discussion of recent thinkers who tried to deal with the problem. A discussion of Myth and Logos; the origins of the conceptualization of Being. A brief examination of Hans Blumenberg’s understanding of myth as a “fleeing in the face of Being”. An argum
upstart
发表于 2025-3-23 22:22:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425264/425264_14.png
深渊
发表于 2025-3-24 06:05:54
The Neoplatonists: The Path of Relationlationality becomes more obvious in the Trinitarian understanding of the Christian Neoplatonists. The Trinity represents a shift in the understanding of relation as . (toward some thing) to relation as . (state or condition). A discussion of the understanding of the Trinity as relation in the Cappad
解冻
发表于 2025-3-24 10:27:14
The Aristotelians: The Path of Substancehe Scholastic understanding of God. An explanation of Aristotle’s understanding of substance and how his understanding of substance grounds his understanding of relation. A brief discussion on how the Aristotelian understanding impacts Scholastic thinking on God. God is understood as essentially One
Ointment
发表于 2025-3-24 12:51:28
Heidegger has become problematic. Heidegger moves beyond Husserl’s phenomenology, rejects substance as the way to understand reality, and so begins to offer a “new” way to understand Being. How Being is understood relationally. The distinction between present-at-hand and ready-to-hand. Presence-at-hand (subs
FLIRT
发表于 2025-3-24 17:22:14
Conclusionrs purport to see relation as ontologically foundational. A brief examination of Whitehead, Rescher, Niemoczynski, and Benjamin. How they all fall short of an ontology truly grounded upon relationality. Relationality as definitive for the understanding of personhood. Metaphysical, epistemological, a
天空
发表于 2025-3-24 22:40:59
James FillerOffers a new understanding of being in terms of relationality.Demonstrates why the understanding of being as substance is flawed.Traces the history of relational ontology from the Presocratics to Heid
Enliven
发表于 2025-3-24 23:40:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425264/425264_20.png