GENUS
发表于 2025-3-25 05:49:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425214/425214_21.png
Trigger-Point
发表于 2025-3-25 09:02:12
Book 1969lop the thought of their predecessors into systems of their own. Both were thus committed in principle to the view that philosophy in each age of civilization is at once a product, a criticism, and a recon struction of the values and insights of its own past; that the fertile mind can only beget an
高脚酒杯
发表于 2025-3-25 13:45:33
I,the modems to undertake seriously the enterprise of a . Aristotelianism; that he was consciously trying to get back to Aristotle in emphasizing the concrete as opposed to the abstract universal.. Georg Lasson, the German editor of Hegel’s ., has expressed perhaps most emphatically the relation of Aristotle and Hegel.
广告
发表于 2025-3-25 16:58:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425214/425214_24.png
Pulmonary-Veins
发表于 2025-3-25 20:26:46
978-94-015-0174-3Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1969
公理
发表于 2025-3-26 00:33:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425214/425214_26.png
Vulnerary
发表于 2025-3-26 07:05:54
II,ermination of sense-perception”.. The vegetative soul is to be regarded as the “first” soul, whose essence is simply energy of the type described, life in its most basic aspect. This Hegel calls the “general Notion” of soul itself, for as we have seen, Aristotle refers to soul as the essence of the whole living body.
木讷
发表于 2025-3-26 11:12:45
Concluding Remarks,A central aim of this essay has been to trace some of the Aristotelian “roots” of Hegel’s speculation regarding the philosophy of mind. It is difficult to find two philosophers of such speculative magnitude who have more in common than Aristotle and Hegel, although quite the contrary has often been supposed.
Seminar
发表于 2025-3-26 16:29:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425214/425214_29.png
猛烈责骂
发表于 2025-3-26 17:45:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425214/425214_30.png