脆弱带来
发表于 2025-3-26 22:04:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_31.png
FACT
发表于 2025-3-27 02:18:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_32.png
Gratuitous
发表于 2025-3-27 08:50:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_33.png
终点
发表于 2025-3-27 10:23:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_34.png
带子
发表于 2025-3-27 16:46:31
The Kelsen-Hart Debate: Hart’s Critique of Kelsen’s Legal Monism Reconsideredne of the least plausible aspects of Kelsen’s pure theory of law. This paper challenges the criticism of Kelsen’s monism in the work of H.L.A. Hart. In particular, it will argue that Hart failed to show that Kelsen’s monism rests on a mistaken criterion of the identity of legal system and that it is
无可争辩
发表于 2025-3-27 18:08:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_36.png
perimenopause
发表于 2025-3-28 00:09:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_37.png
CESS
发表于 2025-3-28 03:11:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_38.png
collagenase
发表于 2025-3-28 09:46:18
Kelsen and Niebuhr on Democracyeveled his criticism of Niebuhr in his essay on the “Foundations of Democracy” published in the October 1955 issue of the journal . Unfortunately, it seems Niebuhr was unaware of Kelsen’s essay. However, Niebuhr’s extensive writings on democracy provide a solid basis for a serious response to Kelsen
切碎
发表于 2025-3-28 11:55:22
Hans Kelsen’s Psychoanalytic Heritage—An Ehrenzweigian Reconstruction of law’s alleged substantial and explanatory gaps. The following chapter analyzes and categorizes some of the arguments Kelsen develops in his defense and, in so doing, identifies human irrationality as an important, albeit undisclosed, hypothesis informing the pure theory of law. Claiming . that a