lavish
发表于 2025-3-23 10:33:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_11.png
ANTH
发表于 2025-3-23 15:57:16
Philosophy of Law and Theory of Law: “The Continuity of Kelsen’s Years in America”lex, and is rooted in his culture,—along with his philosophical and human .. It refers mostly to secular religions, to the archaic aspects of human beliefs, to myth and to the primitive conception of the soul. Even though they may be completely different, the two concepts go hand in hand, and one do
ordain
发表于 2025-3-23 21:30:35
Cognition and Reason: Rethinking Kelsen in the Context of Contract and Business Laws who actually do the practicing, then at least for those who teach them. Facing reality before deciding on a course of action is often the hardest task for lawyers and their clients. I am thus skeptical of a legal “science” that seeks an ironically and paradoxically abstract positive law of contrac
曲解
发表于 2025-3-23 23:57:47
Kelsen’s View of the Addressee of the Law: Primary and Secondary Normses a fertile analytic tool for understanding the persistence of technical terms and jargon within American codes, despite decades of attempted “plain language” reforms across the American legal system. His framework also has much to offer for understanding interpretive rules pertaining to legislativ
insightful
发表于 2025-3-24 05:20:34
Thomas Olechowskiest countries face the heaviest policy constraints imposed by the emerging global financial system. It has even been argued that the demands of capital are not only distorting policymaking and destroying social services provision, but also undermining the viability of the state.
膝盖
发表于 2025-3-24 06:56:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_16.png
冥想后
发表于 2025-3-24 14:10:51
Arriving at Justice by a Process of Elimination: Hans Kelsen and Leo Straussotherwise real differences, the two texts articulate the same important idea: if one wants to think about political issues, one has to address the question of justice. This chapter will attempt to illustrate through a comparison of these two texts the importance of addressing the question of justice, especially in our modern democracies.
bisphosphonate
发表于 2025-3-24 16:33:52
Kelsen and Niebuhr on Democracying their respective views on (1) the liberal tradition; (2) Christianity and democracy; (3) religion, totalitarianism and democracy; (4) pre-conditions and portability of democracy; and (5) justice, liberty and equality.
Aspirin
发表于 2025-3-24 21:30:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4241/424064/424064_19.png
仔细检查
发表于 2025-3-25 00:46:15
Book 2016y, and political, democratic, and internationalrelations theory could be relevant to current debates within the U.S. academyin those areas. Along the way, the volume examines Kelsen’s relationship andoften hidden influences on other members of the mid-century Central Europeanémigré community whose w