噱头
发表于 2025-3-25 06:40:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34306-3questions: What is the general role of the new media . in China’s politics today? What are the power relations and factors regarding the new public sphere? How are the performances of Habermas’s conceptions, Foucault’s claims, and . in China today? To answer these questions, this chapter is divided
邪恶的你
发表于 2025-3-25 09:06:12
Introduction,xt has always been an important concern. Since the . in 1919, when the concepts of . (德先生, Mr. De) and . (赛先生, Mr. Sai) were introduced into Chinese society on a wide scale, democracy has been regarded as the inevitable issue in the modernisation of Chinese society.
comely
发表于 2025-3-25 13:57:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4204/420374/420374_23.png
Addictive
发表于 2025-3-25 18:07:18
: Another Normative Interpretation on Discourse Theory,and makes some comparisons with Habermas’s concept of . and Foucault’s .. Although the conception of Confucian Rationality is also a type of normative interpretation, we believe that it may play an important role in balancing the tension between Habermas’s and Foucault’s two normative theories.
狂乱
发表于 2025-3-25 23:35:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4204/420374/420374_25.png
万灵丹
发表于 2025-3-26 03:40:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4204/420374/420374_26.png
激励
发表于 2025-3-26 06:50:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4204/420374/420374_27.png
雄伟
发表于 2025-3-26 08:50:54
Susan Laird,Kristen Ogilvie Holzern Western academia, we discuss and define it from a new perspective. Specifically, we show that the difference between Foucault and Habermas is a type of fundamental tension in a Western cultural context.
muffler
发表于 2025-3-26 16:34:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34306-3here? How are the performances of Habermas’s conceptions, Foucault’s claims, and . in China today? To answer these questions, this chapter is divided into two sections: a general study and a case study.
Intellectual
发表于 2025-3-26 20:24:49
,Communicative Rationality or Power Discourse: Foucault’s Challenge to Habermas,n Western academia, we discuss and define it from a new perspective. Specifically, we show that the difference between Foucault and Habermas is a type of fundamental tension in a Western cultural context.