CLAY 发表于 2025-3-25 04:58:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3891/389046/389046_21.png–DOX 发表于 2025-3-25 10:18:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3891/389046/389046_22.png中止 发表于 2025-3-25 15:19:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3891/389046/389046_23.png小步舞 发表于 2025-3-25 16:24:41
Societies and Cultures (1): Forms of Living Togetherand, humans and their society and culture (including the art and culture of moral status ascription) and, on the other hand, uncultured ‘nature’ or ‘wilderness’. It may also be taken to assume that on the one hand there are ‘humans’ and on the other hand there is ‘culture’, as a separate sphere whicTonometry 发表于 2025-3-25 22:03:49
Societies and Cultures (2): Forms of Lifees this mean, and what can be gained by using this term? Wittgenstein’s concept ‘form of life’ (.) lends itself to different interpretations. Here I will respond to what we may call Gier’s ‘pluralist’ interpretation, which takes ‘form of life’ to have linguistic, behavioural, cultural and biologicalconceal 发表于 2025-3-26 01:13:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3891/389046/389046_26.png使无效 发表于 2025-3-26 05:19:01
Spirits and Gods: Forms of Religionatus often explicitly aim to find a . justification of moral status. The properties approach, in particular, can be understood as a way to rationally determine the moral status of an entity by examining its properties. As I said in the first part of this book, this is a scientific approach to moral分开 发表于 2025-3-26 12:04:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3891/389046/389046_28.pngduplicate 发表于 2025-3-26 14:25:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3891/389046/389046_29.png忍耐 发表于 2025-3-26 18:35:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3891/389046/389046_30.png