backdrop
发表于 2025-3-25 06:44:55
Privatising Welfare,res which can be claimed to represent improvements in public service. The chapter starts and ends with the political basis of the welfare state and includes examples of policy changes in the provision and delivery of personal social services, housing, education, health and social security.
wall-stress
发表于 2025-3-25 08:54:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387705/387705_22.png
dissent
发表于 2025-3-25 12:58:07
alternative view of the basis of good government. This book offers a unique survey and critique of the ideas and influence of an important branch of political thought and its links with market theories.
流出
发表于 2025-3-25 16:50:25
techniques. This book gives a concise, non- technical account of these ‘public choice‘ theories and examines their influence upon government policies in English-speaking countries. Issues covered include slimming the state, privatising welfare and re- structuring government. Final chapters offer an
cunning
发表于 2025-3-25 20:50:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55396-8nterest to oppose prevailing special interests; to harness ‘latent interests’ to overcome the roadblocks of entrenched organisations; and to persuade their own party and supporters to eschew ‘consensus politics’ in favour of radical measures and a bold confrontation of opponents.
使苦恼
发表于 2025-3-26 01:53:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387705/387705_26.png
悠然
发表于 2025-3-26 07:14:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387705/387705_27.png
Commentary
发表于 2025-3-26 09:11:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3878/387705/387705_28.png
Debate
发表于 2025-3-26 14:24:10
Restructuring Government,nment and bureaucracy, but it is possible to examine the new directions which have been imposed upon the often resistant structure of the state. Nor can it be said that these directions are entirely novel, since in some cases they represent an acceleration of trends which were already present in earlier decades.
Carbon-Monoxide
发表于 2025-3-26 17:40:11
Slimming the State,nterest to oppose prevailing special interests; to harness ‘latent interests’ to overcome the roadblocks of entrenched organisations; and to persuade their own party and supporters to eschew ‘consensus politics’ in favour of radical measures and a bold confrontation of opponents.