入会 发表于 2025-3-26 23:17:56
Interpretive Strategiesan’s modal structuralism, and Stephen Yablo’s figuralism. The first two represent paraphrastic strategies, while the last takes abstract object talk to be figurative language. All three are found to be viable options for the theist as responses to indispensability arguments for Platonism.Insulin 发表于 2025-3-27 01:27:04
Introduction doctrine of divine aseity is introduced. The distinction between abstract and concrete objects is expounded. A distinction between heavyweight and lightweight Platonism is drawn and illustrated from the work of Bob Hale and Crispin Wright, Michael Dummett, and John Burgess and Gideon Rosen. It is esebaceous-gland 发表于 2025-3-27 08:18:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_33.png含糊 发表于 2025-3-27 13:14:20
Non-platonic RealismWhile conceptualism holds promise for the theist, a number of worries about the adequacy of divine thoughts as substitutes for abstract objects should motivate theists to examine more seriously the wide variety of anti-realist solutions.Institution 发表于 2025-3-27 16:26:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_35.pngAntecedent 发表于 2025-3-27 19:47:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_36.pngAssemble 发表于 2025-3-27 22:45:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_37.png停止偿付 发表于 2025-3-28 06:10:47
Neo-Meinongianismed, followed by a detailed examination of the so-called none-ism of the iconoclast Richard Routley. The neo-Meinongian rejection of the so-called Ontological Assumption and the Reference Theory is endorsed as a salutary challenge to the neo-Quinean criterion of ontological commitment, even if in the乞讨 发表于 2025-3-28 07:22:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_39.pngLAPSE 发表于 2025-3-28 11:46:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_40.png