Dignant
发表于 2025-3-23 10:07:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_11.png
六边形
发表于 2025-3-23 17:56:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2616-9tense theoretical approach. This approach is defended against objections based on the obvious truth of mathematics and the disanalogy of mathematics to fiction. A pretense theoretical approach is found to be especially plausible for set theory, which may be taken as a foundation for all of mathematics.
不成比例
发表于 2025-3-23 18:18:08
,Adaptivität und Benutzermodellierung,logical Assumption and the Reference Theory is endorsed as a salutary challenge to the neo-Quinean criterion of ontological commitment, even if in the end the neo-Meinongian Independence Thesis cannot plausibly be accepted.
albuminuria
发表于 2025-3-23 23:44:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_14.png
Arteriography
发表于 2025-3-24 02:49:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_15.png
唤起
发表于 2025-3-24 08:12:53
Book 2017sm with respect to abstract objects. A synoptic work in analytic philosophy of religion, the book engages discussions in philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of language, metaphysics, and metaontology. It addresses absolute creationism, non-Platonic realism, fictionalism, neutralism, and alternativ
使残废
发表于 2025-3-24 12:53:24
Book 2017heism. It contains a most thorough discussion, rooted in careful exegesis, of the biblical and patristic basis of the doctrine of divine aseity. Finally, it challenges the influential Quinean metaontological theses concerning the way in which we makeontological commitments..
集中营
发表于 2025-3-24 16:19:38
and patristic basis of the doctrine of divine aseity. Finally, it challenges the influential Quinean metaontological theses concerning the way in which we makeontological commitments..978-3-319-85646-9978-3-319-55384-9
都相信我的话
发表于 2025-3-24 21:01:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3872/387196/387196_19.png
高原
发表于 2025-3-25 00:38:53
Life Engineering as a Discipline,The biblical and patristic witness to the doctrine of divine aseity and God’s status as the only uncreated (.) being is expounded in detail through a careful exegesis of original texts. Arguments based on perfect being theology reinforce the traditional doctrine that God alone is uncreated.