祖先
发表于 2025-3-25 05:13:22
Same-Sex Marriage in France and Spain: Comparing Resistance in a Centralized Secular Republic and tocialist government presents same-sex marriage law as being in historical continuity with the ideals of the Republic, defining marriage as a republican institution embodying equality and secularization, while the Spanish socialist government has used marriage as a source of political polarization and proof of modernity.
MULTI
发表于 2025-3-25 10:36:07
Europeanizing vs. Nationalizing the Issue of Same-Sex Marriage in Central Europe: A Comparative Anaount of the debates on the recognition of same-sex partnerships held in the region in the context of EU accession, it further explores the role of Europeanization-driven versus domestic variables by focusing on four specific countries: Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Croatia.
精密
发表于 2025-3-25 14:31:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386485/386485_23.png
jealousy
发表于 2025-3-25 16:00:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386485/386485_24.png
无孔
发表于 2025-3-25 23:40:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1775-1to exploit. Across all these differences, one factor remains constant: sexuality and the family remain at the heart of the (gendered) construction of national meaning. How that meaning is shaped, politically and legally, is not, however, a straightforward process, and a number of paradoxes emerge.
Expediency
发表于 2025-3-26 01:43:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386485/386485_26.png
停止偿付
发表于 2025-3-26 07:29:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386485/386485_27.png
低能儿
发表于 2025-3-26 08:33:51
Erratum to: Global Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage,
OUTRE
发表于 2025-3-26 13:48:39
2569-1317 ism. Through three neo-institutionalist lenses—historical, sociological and discursive—contributors investigate two aspects of the processes of adoption or opposition of equal recognition of same-sex partnershi978-3-319-87388-6978-3-319-62764-9Series ISSN 2569-1317 Series E-ISSN 2569-1309
Blazon
发表于 2025-3-26 17:38:58
Book 2018he analytical framework used for exploring these factors in this book is neo-institutionalism. Through three neo-institutionalist lenses—historical, sociological and discursive—contributors investigate two aspects of the processes of adoption or opposition of equal recognition of same-sex partnershi