凹处
发表于 2025-3-23 12:21:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386485/386485_11.png
lavish
发表于 2025-3-23 14:25:32
Historical Institutionalism and Same-Sex Marriage: A Comparative Analysis of the USA and Canada, contrast to the state-by-state struggle for same-sex marriage that occurs in the USA. At the same time, recent court rulings in the USA demonstrate the impact of national-level judicial decision-making. Comparing two countries with strong courts highlights the factors that condition judicial impact in this policy area.
innate
发表于 2025-3-23 19:47:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386485/386485_13.png
PTCA635
发表于 2025-3-23 23:03:54
The Globalization of LGBT Identity and Same-Sex Marriage as a Catalyst of Neo-institutional Values: to the globalized world of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) identities and increasing jurisdictions where same-sex marriage has become legal. As such identities globalize and begin to be institutionalized, a series of counter-reactions has followed and subsequently produced unexpected outcomes.
切掉
发表于 2025-3-24 05:50:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386485/386485_15.png
CROW
发表于 2025-3-24 07:18:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35127-4sm demonstrates that a federalist structure was essential for same-sex marriage in Brazil, while the unitary composition of Chile provides fewer policy avenues for LGBT rights. Using Political Opportunity Structure, we then demonstrate how the judicialization of LGBT rights in Brazil led to success for same-sex marriage.
GILD
发表于 2025-3-24 11:57:35
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1245-9ocialist government presents same-sex marriage law as being in historical continuity with the ideals of the Republic, defining marriage as a republican institution embodying equality and secularization, while the Spanish socialist government has used marriage as a source of political polarization and proof of modernity.
cuticle
发表于 2025-3-24 17:38:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3865/386485/386485_18.png
INERT
发表于 2025-3-24 22:43:55
Ion Beam Surface Layer Analysisessitating a referendum in 2015 to legalize same-sex marriage. By contrast, in Australia marriage is not a constitutional matter, but the Marriage Amendment Act (2004) explicitly requires that marriage be between a man and a woman. At the time of writing, same-sex marriage remains illegal there.
NEEDY
发表于 2025-3-25 02:06:36
A Tale of Two Congresses: Sex, Institutions, and Evangelicals in Brazil and Chile,sm demonstrates that a federalist structure was essential for same-sex marriage in Brazil, while the unitary composition of Chile provides fewer policy avenues for LGBT rights. Using Political Opportunity Structure, we then demonstrate how the judicialization of LGBT rights in Brazil led to success for same-sex marriage.