MAG 发表于 2025-3-25 04:56:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3858/385759/385759_21.pngdeactivate 发表于 2025-3-25 08:16:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3858/385759/385759_22.pngAnemia 发表于 2025-3-25 13:56:01
Introduction,f individual films, considered more broadly. It then briefly contextualises the approach taken by this book within the relevant scholarship (although it is necessarily selective, given the huge extent of the literature), before briefly introducing the specific contents of the volume.你正派 发表于 2025-3-25 18:19:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3858/385759/385759_24.png财政 发表于 2025-3-25 21:44:17
978-3-031-33307-1The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl去才蔑视 发表于 2025-3-26 01:24:00
Gilles Deleuze and Film Criticism978-3-031-33305-7Series ISSN 2946-5435 Series E-ISSN 2946-5443易改变 发表于 2025-3-26 04:52:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3858/385759/385759_27.png鄙视读作 发表于 2025-3-26 12:31:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3858/385759/385759_28.png牵索 发表于 2025-3-26 15:30:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3858/385759/385759_29.pngBanquet 发表于 2025-3-26 19:16:39
What Does Deleuze Do When He Does Film Criticism?you who do cinema? And what do I do exactly when I do or hope to do philosophy?” Both practices, Deleuze suggests, involve an act of creation. If philosophers invent concepts, filmmakers invent “cinematographic ideas” by means of “blocks of movement-duration”. As a philosopher who thinks seriously a