mosque
发表于 2025-3-25 05:29:45
George III as a European Figure,ch he inherited in 1760 was that of a major European ruler. Under the terms of the personal union with Hanover which dated from 1714 he exercised an Electoral vote in the Diet of the Holy Roman Empire, of which he held the nominal office of Arch-Treasurer from 1778. By descent and, from 1761, by mar
Stagger
发表于 2025-3-25 08:49:23
,George III and British Politics, 1760–1784,e had received had been almost entirely favourable, and focused mainly upon his virtuous youth and upon the philanthropic interests which he inherited from his father, Prince Frederick. He was reported, for instance, to have contributed £200 for the victims of a fire in King Street.. He visited the
眉毛
发表于 2025-3-25 13:12:50
The Religion of George III, the throne on 18 November 1760 he proclaimed the protection of the ‘Protestant Interest’ in Europe as a major British objective in the Seven Years’ War;. he ended his reign as a champion of the Protestant constitution with his successful resistance to Catholic Emancipation. By the Act of Settlement
排他
发表于 2025-3-25 17:56:56
George III and Empire,olved no political or cultural theory of empire. He was well aware, however, of his imperial responsibilities. As a leading scholar has recently noted, ‘Monarchy was at the legal core of the empire’.. The nearest which the empire could claim to a uniting bond was not any kind of common citizenship,
Formidable
发表于 2025-3-25 22:00:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384001/384001_25.png
Hangar
发表于 2025-3-26 01:25:25
Conclusion,in 1760 at the peak of his political fortunes, amid the victory celebrations of the Seven Years’ War. George III died in the midst of the national discontent which had given rise to the march of the ‘Blan-keteers’, the Pentrich rising, Peterloo and the ‘Six Acts’. Yet George III was mourned with far
危机
发表于 2025-3-26 08:22:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384001/384001_27.png
Detoxification
发表于 2025-3-26 10:44:04
Dorothee Gronostay,Sabine Manzels of primary, albeit not exclusive, importance in the conduct of foreign policy. Although ministers in cabinet, both Houses of Parliament and (to a lesser extent and usually in a negative direction) public opinion all wielded influence, the scope for initiatives on the part of the Crown were greater
Abutment
发表于 2025-3-26 13:21:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3841/384001/384001_29.png
Dissonance
发表于 2025-3-26 19:40:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88728-3eorge III before denouncing him as ‘A Prince whose character is... marked by every act which may define a Tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free People’.. This was a view shared by a significant number of the King’s domestic opponents. On the other hand, the King was seen by many Americ