Meander
发表于 2025-3-26 23:37:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383991/383991_31.png
TRAWL
发表于 2025-3-27 01:41:12
Konzeptualisierung des Modells,at such views are untenable. Critical scrutiny of . in particular strongly suggests there is no commitment to any moral system and that she anticipates Bernard Williams’s moral philosophy with its emphasis on ‘the ethical’ rather than on morality as a set of principles or a system. Also Jacques Derr
Incorporate
发表于 2025-3-27 07:35:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05672-8thin Victorian conventions. Henry James, however, misses the point when he claims that Eliot neglects the opportunity for a properly psychological approach by refusing to restrict her focus to one dominating consciousness. Though still able to explore individual psychology in depth, in her later nov
Blood-Vessels
发表于 2025-3-27 11:50:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383991/383991_34.png
引导
发表于 2025-3-27 14:00:07
Ausgangslage und Problemstellung, cosmopolitanism. It also implies that British imperial power is likely to be under threat since there are hints that Germany and America will be the major powers of the future. It breaks new ground in the structure of its narrative, its treatment of psychology and temporality being complex and inno
打谷工具
发表于 2025-3-27 20:29:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3840/383991/383991_36.png
令人发腻
发表于 2025-3-28 01:21:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91926-3George Eliot bicentennial; reception studies; otherness in literature; the other in literature; literary
Etching
发表于 2025-3-28 02:23:02
978-3-030-06330-6The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
证实
发表于 2025-3-28 06:50:15
K. M. NewtonProvides a comprehensive overview of Eliot’s critical reception.Aims to bolster Eliot’s place as a canonical author.Explores the complexities of Eliot’s writing, mindset, and life through archival mat
Presbyopia
发表于 2025-3-28 10:29:53
Wolfgang Harth,Helmut Grotheine Befragung in Deutschland eingestehen (Donsbach et al. 2009, S. 133). Die seither zwischen „Lügenpresse“-Vorwürfen und Vorstellungen einer „Vierten Gewalt“ oszillierende und eskalierende Diskussion dürfte das Bild des Journalismus in der Öffentlichkeit nicht versachlicht haben. Den Boden für solc