mydriatic
发表于 2025-3-25 06:00:56
Knowledge-Power-Values,f SGE, the invocation of ‘emergency’, the elevation of cost-benefit thinking, the narrowing of ethical debates, and the implications of SGE for capitalism and geo-political ordering. In each case the analysis shows how contradictory forces and imperatives cohabit, in ways which restrain SGE’s normalisation.
只有
发表于 2025-3-25 09:55:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_22.png
sphincter
发表于 2025-3-25 15:28:01
Book 2019inaries which animate ‘engineering the climate’ and discusses why this climate solution is so controversial. The book explains geoengineering’s past, its revival in the mid-2000s, and its future prospects including its shadow presence in the Paris climate accord. The main focus however is on dissect
狂怒
发表于 2025-3-25 16:39:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_24.png
假装是你
发表于 2025-3-25 20:11:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_25.png
高兴去去
发表于 2025-3-26 02:41:50
Ursula Degener,Beate Rosenzweig of the book’s analysis for thinking about climate policy post-Paris and about environmentalism more generally, before considering whether SGE will ever come into being as a deployed technology and a third leg of climate policy.
固执点好
发表于 2025-3-26 06:22:32
The Re-emergence of Solar Geoengineering, revival are traced, and the various ways in which it is framed, understood and imagined today are analysed. This analysis shows how geoengineering has been unable to be normalised as a respectable third leg of climate policy. It is researched and imagined but it lacks legitimacy and traction.
epidermis
发表于 2025-3-26 08:43:56
Conclusion, of the book’s analysis for thinking about climate policy post-Paris and about environmentalism more generally, before considering whether SGE will ever come into being as a deployed technology and a third leg of climate policy.
RADE
发表于 2025-3-26 15:52:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_29.png
运动的我
发表于 2025-3-26 17:19:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_30.png