流利圆滑 发表于 2025-3-23 10:02:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17359-3solar geoengineering; Anthropocene; geomanagement; geoengineering post-war; climate policy; climate politCoterminous 发表于 2025-3-23 16:54:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_12.pngLAITY 发表于 2025-3-23 19:38:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_13.png材料等 发表于 2025-3-23 22:19:57
,Die Syndrome der Cerebrospinalflüssigkeit,o growing concerns about climate change. The institutional assessments of SGE are analysed in depth. The most common rationales that accompanied SGE’s revival are traced, and the various ways in which it is framed, understood and imagined today are analysed. This analysis shows how geoengineering hamyopia 发表于 2025-3-24 03:19:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_15.pngbacteria 发表于 2025-3-24 08:42:42
Georg Freiherr von Salis-Soglio it as a concept. The focus is on three things: epistemological and knowledge choices, questions of values and ontological ordering, and the relationship of SGE to power and the powerful. In particular, a critical eye is cast on the elevation of the ‘techno-scientific’ in institutional assessments oPituitary-Gland 发表于 2025-3-24 12:32:03
Die Neutralität im heutigen Völkerrechtsolar geoengineering (SGE) is embraced and deployed, or spurned and discarded. These are: the relevance of actual changes in climate and weather; the extent to which elites see SGE as essential to stabilising the dominant geo-political and socioeconomic order; and the degree to which SGE’s proponentNeolithic 发表于 2025-3-24 17:42:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_18.png在前面 发表于 2025-3-24 20:36:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_19.png我怕被刺穿 发表于 2025-3-25 02:40:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3832/383142/383142_20.png