AWL
发表于 2025-4-1 05:30:00
Knowing in Everyday Lifeby some kind of definition of the area that is to be studied. For we must be quite clear at the outset as to what we are going to deal with, what questions we hope to answer. Hence the first thing we must ask ourselves is: What actually is knowledge?
A保存的
发表于 2025-4-1 07:30:01
Knowing in Sciencenced with a totally different stress. Yet we shall soon see that ‘know’ does not take on a new, special meaning in science, that knowing in science and knowing in ordinary life are essentially the same. The only difference is that in science and philosophy the loftier aim and subject-matter of the c
Infinitesimal
发表于 2025-4-1 11:08:51
Knowing by Means of Conceptsertain about it. One might be tempted to say — and many logicians have indeed said — that a concept is simply an image with a strictly fixed content. As we have seen, however, there are no such entities in psychological reality because all images are to one degree or another vague. One might of cour
1FAWN
发表于 2025-4-1 15:33:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3822/382135/382135_64.png
纺织品
发表于 2025-4-1 18:41:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3822/382135/382135_65.png
LAVE
发表于 2025-4-2 01:35:02
The Nature of Judgmentsexplore the nature of .. For, implicit definitions determine concepts by virtue of the fact that certain axioms — which themselves are judgments — hold with regard to these concepts; thus such definitions make concepts depend on judgments. All other types of definitions likewise consist of judgments
Generalize
发表于 2025-4-2 05:59:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3822/382135/382135_67.png
Etching
发表于 2025-4-2 10:28:10
What Knowledge is NotIs knowledge nothing more than a mere designating? If so, does the human mind not remain forever a stranger to and remote from the things, processes and relations it wishes to know? Can it never effect a more intimate union with the objects of this world, of which it too is a member?
侵略者
发表于 2025-4-2 11:34:10
The Analytic Character of Rigorous Inference criticism that attacks the actual import and usefulness of this kind of inference. This, perhaps, is what motivates the efforts, referred to just above, of those who do not wish to see the exact inferences in the sciences come under the jurisdiction of the syllogism. For it is a well-known fact tha