冥界三河
发表于 2025-3-28 16:27:29
Knowing by Means of ImagesTo know is to re-cognize . or rediscover .. And to rediscover is to equate . is known with . it is known. We must now clarify this act of equating if we are to deepen our insight into the nature of knowing.
ARY
发表于 2025-3-28 21:18:02
Judging and KnowingWith this we return to the analysis of the cognitive process. For we have now gone far enough in our study of the means required for knowing — concepts and judgments — to be able to penetrate more deeply into the nature of knowledge itself.
DIS
发表于 2025-3-29 02:20:30
What is Truth?What is our purpose in coordinating concepts to objects? The answer has already been given: to be able to make judgments about objects. But why do we make judgments about objects, why do we coordinate judgments as signs to facts? To answer this, we need only make clear to ourselves what end is served generally by the use of signs.
hypertension
发表于 2025-3-29 03:56:32
On the Value of KnowledgeIt is now appropriate to ask why men really seek knowledge. Why do we devote our lives to this curious occupation of constantly searching out sameness in difference? Why do we strive to designate the rich manifold of the universe by means of only those concepts that are built up from a minimum number of elementary concepts?
缩短
发表于 2025-3-29 07:45:14
The Interconnectedness of KnowledgeScience is a system of truths, not a mere collection.
DRILL
发表于 2025-3-29 11:52:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3822/382135/382135_46.png
Ordeal
发表于 2025-3-29 18:31:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3822/382135/382135_47.png
KIN
发表于 2025-3-29 22:40:59
David W. F. Standingford,Shaun A. Forthnced with a totally different stress. Yet we shall soon see that ‘know’ does not take on a new, special meaning in science, that knowing in science and knowing in ordinary life are essentially the same. The only difference is that in science and philosophy the loftier aim and subject-matter of the cognitive process lend it a greater dignity.
BRACE
发表于 2025-3-30 00:50:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3822/382135/382135_49.png
正式通知
发表于 2025-3-30 07:47:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9820-0ual or “ideal” sciences. It emerges all the more sharply, however, in the empirical or “real” sciences. In these sciences it has a fundamental importance; and a prime task of epistemology is to make use of this distinction in order to clarify the kinds of validity possessed by various judgments.