Aprope
发表于 2025-3-23 11:13:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3804/380395/380395_11.png
警告
发表于 2025-3-23 17:49:33
Oliver Huxhold,Clemens Tesch-Römerfrom that of the present day. Its predominant characteristic was its very stringent requirements for certitude and infallibility, requirements that set it apart from opinion, which results from probable reasoning and is revisable whenever more plausible arguments become available. In view of Galileo
labile
发表于 2025-3-23 21:16:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3804/380395/380395_13.png
描绘
发表于 2025-3-24 00:33:01
Gabriele Doblhammer,Uta Ziegler part of our study, that relating to his actual use of the scientific methodology it implies, his ... Before citing specific examples of such use we would stress a point made earlier, one on which Zabarella, Vallius, and Galileo all agree, namely, that there is a vast difference between . and . [Sec
cacophony
发表于 2025-3-24 05:38:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04779-8 based. Yet, at the time he published the ., he lacked, or at least did not have in usable form, a terrestrial mechanics that could integrate these data within a systematic structure. Earlier his experimental genius and his skill at developing measuring techniques had stood him in good stead when he
Generosity
发表于 2025-3-24 09:35:01
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230359086l finding is quite simple: that Galileo employed the demonstrative regress of the Paduan Aristotelians, transmitted to him via the lecture notes of Jesuits at the Collegio Romano, to give causal explanations of phenomena he was the first to discover in the emerging sciences of astronomy and mechanic
元音
发表于 2025-3-24 14:05:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3804/380395/380395_17.png
sleep-spindles
发表于 2025-3-24 17:55:33
Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof978-94-015-8040-3Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942
bonnet
发表于 2025-3-24 20:20:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8040-3Galileo Galilei; logic; science
Extemporize
发表于 2025-3-25 00:17:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23524-7eries in a general way; its aim is to give an overview of Galileo’s views on logic as explained in this volume and thus introduce the reader to the more detailed discussions to be found in the chapters to follow.