听觉 发表于 2025-3-28 16:50:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3208/320735/320735_41.pngmastopexy 发表于 2025-3-28 21:45:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8182-0lutizes the Way as the source of value, which conflicts with Zhuangzi’s perspectivism. Third, the Daoist practical identity neither fits the Zhuangzian flexibility of identity nor explains the normative force by attuning to the Way.Compatriot 发表于 2025-3-29 01:06:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3208/320735/320735_43.pngPlatelet 发表于 2025-3-29 05:11:09
,Ethics and Normativity in ,: A Commentary on Jung Lee’s Ethics of Attunement,lutizes the Way as the source of value, which conflicts with Zhuangzi’s perspectivism. Third, the Daoist practical identity neither fits the Zhuangzian flexibility of identity nor explains the normative force by attuning to the Way.infantile 发表于 2025-3-29 10:23:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3208/320735/320735_45.png相反放置 发表于 2025-3-29 12:01:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3208/320735/320735_46.pngTraumatic-Grief 发表于 2025-3-29 16:30:57
How , and , Can Shape a Plausible Zhuangist Ethics,veral aspects of my interpretation of a Zhuangist ethical outlook. Her discussion reveals several respects in which my previous treatments were insufficiently clear or precise. I am grateful for her meticulous critical appraisal, which highlights several dimensions along which I need to elaborate my proposed interpretation.外表读作 发表于 2025-3-29 21:24:50
Introduction, Others, however, argue that it contains a rich ethical framework, emphasizing equality, self-cultivation, social harmony, and the exercise of prudence. This introduction offers an overview of this background and the current state of the field of Zhuangzi’s ethics, with the aim of demonstrating theNeedlework 发表于 2025-3-30 03:28:17
,How Is Zhuangzi Not a Relativist? A Critique of David Wong’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi as a Pluralere is no rational and universal justification for any morality, which requires us to take a relativistic stance toward different moral views, treating a plurality of moral views (but not necessarily all) as worthy of appreciation or, at least, tolerance. His . (1984a) is “the first book-length stud排名真古怪 发表于 2025-3-30 05:22:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3208/320735/320735_50.png