habile
发表于 2025-3-25 05:01:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11783-2. 道, or ways or paths, and . 德, the agentive powers by which we pursue ways or paths. L. Hong Ki 林康琪 presents a forceful, invigorating challenge to several aspects of my interpretation of a Zhuangist ethical outlook. Her discussion reveals several respects in which my previous treatments were insuff
不出名
发表于 2025-3-25 09:07:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83660-1ights in the Daoist classic for addressing the ethical issues of our time. It is commonly believed that ethics is not Zhuangzi’s primary concern. For example, Chad Hansen famously said in his study, ., that what Zhuangzi tells us about the “Hitler problem” is merely that “Hitler happened” (Hansen 19
BALK
发表于 2025-3-25 14:30:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05802-1the significance of vastness . 大 in the . 逍遙遊. Robert Tsaturyan is worried that with this interpretation, I am advocating creating penumbrae of concepts in which we are obliged to contradict ourselves; these contradictory penumbra then spread everywhere, and force us to make self-contradictory judgm
AVOW
发表于 2025-3-25 16:10:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3208/320735/320735_24.png
纵火
发表于 2025-3-25 22:41:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3208/320735/320735_25.png
兴奋过度
发表于 2025-3-26 00:49:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3208/320735/320735_26.png
misshapen
发表于 2025-3-26 05:37:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69804-0zhuangzi and philosophy; daoism and zhuangzi; daoist ethics; chinese philosophy; zhuangzi and moral rela
火海
发表于 2025-3-26 08:51:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90099-5 of a harmonious social order, and that Zhuangzi’s ethics is a kind of religious ethics not a kind of virtue ethics. I consider the stories of criminals and the story of Cook Ding 庖丁 in Zhuangzi, and I compare Zhuangzi’s moral law with Kant’s moral law.
预示
发表于 2025-3-26 16:27:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/33/3208/320735/320735_29.png
打折
发表于 2025-3-26 18:32:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71058-7 PMR. A PMR-friendly reading is possible only if we accept contested interpretative claims about parts of the . that go beyond the primary textual evidence that is frequently cited in support of such a reading.