Ancillary 发表于 2025-3-25 03:57:50

Struggling Over the Soul of Economics: Objectivity Versus Expertiseo (or, more precisely, ought to do following the traditional ideal). It is quite obvious, however, that making expert judgments more prominent alone won’t suffice. The right kind of expert judgment is needed. The chapter will therefore end with some thoughts about what a better economic expertise might look like.

预防注射 发表于 2025-3-25 08:41:43

Validating Expert Judgment with the Classical Modeld and explained. A proposal for performing cross validation, based largely on the work of Eggstaff et al. (Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121:72–82, 2014) is formulated and illustrated with data from recent expert judgment studies.

Suggestions 发表于 2025-3-25 15:03:49

Introduction: Experts and Consensus in Social Science,ensus formation? And, is there a normative aspect to the formation of scientific and policy making consensus? The contributions of this book focus on experts: those institutional figures that act as a liaison between science and policy makers, politicians, governments, and other public domains.

轮流 发表于 2025-3-25 17:18:05

The Institutional Economics of Stakeholder Consultation; How Experts Can Contribute to Reduce the Cofrom the Netherlands, provide guidelines for the effective institutional setup of such “matching zones”. Specifically, the design of a “matching zone” should try to adhere to the following principles: . there should be a common interest and ample incentives for reaching an agreement; . there should

Obituary 发表于 2025-3-25 20:11:16

Explicating Ways of Consensus-Making in Science and Society: Distinguishing the Academic, the Interfpportunity (Solomon M, The social epistemology of NIH consensus conferences. In: Kincaid H, McKitrick J (ed) Establishing medical reality: methodological and metaphysical issues in philosophy of medicine. Springer, Dordrecht, 2007). Paying attention to the dynamics surrounding consensus, moreover, a

Invertebrate 发表于 2025-3-26 03:58:05

Judgments About the Relevance of Evidence in the Context of Peer Disagreements and Practical Rationapproached in the recent literature. I believe that there is a difference between addressing the disagreement problem hypothetically, or in theory, as an abstraction of ., and regarding this same problem when it is considered from a . point of view, in consideration of features that characterize . ca

剥皮 发表于 2025-3-26 08:04:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319273/319273_27.png

Outspoken 发表于 2025-3-26 08:49:51

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319273/319273_28.png

演讲 发表于 2025-3-26 16:21:31

The Role of Experts in the Condominium Model as Republican (Re-) Solution of Social, Economic, and Pexperts. However, problems arise when one takes into account the variety of expert types, and especially the fact that not all of them fulfill the impartiality condition. This may pose some challenges to the condominium model. In this chapter I present and address those challenges.

headlong 发表于 2025-3-26 18:58:49

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319273/319273_30.png
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Experts and Consensus in Social Science; Carlo Martini,Marcel Boumans Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Applyin